Tag Archives: RADU TUDOR .MERKEL

RADU TUDOR.DER SPIEGEL:MERKEL CONFLICT LA CURTEA CONSTITUTIONALA DIN GERMANIA!

9 iul.

NU ESTE DE MIRARE DE CE ANGELA MERKEL CARE A ARUNCAT CU 1000 DE MILIARDE DE EURO CUI A VRUT,SA-I IA APARAREA LUI BASESCU.

Merkel, conflict la Curtea Federala Constitutionala din Germania.
Posted by Radu Tudor on July 9th, 2012

Mesajul dat de cancelarul german Angela Merkel referitor la ingrijorarile privind situatia din Romania are, pe linga explicatia fratiei politice cu PDL in cadrul PPE, si o motivatie personala. Frau Merkel este de ceva timp intr-un conflict solid cu judecatorii Curtii Federale Constitutionale din Germania. Acestia considera ca liderul guvernului german a impins prea departe decizia privind implicarea tarii sale in mecanismele financiare si economice europene. Si ca toate aceste decizii ar fi trebuit dezbatute serios inainte de a fi adoptate de Angela Merkel pentru a fi preluate de intreaga Uniune Europeana.

Criza nu e o scuza pentru viziuni personale, scriu analistii germani referitor la conflictul dintre Angela Merkel si Curtea Federala Constitutionala.

Cunoscuta publicatie Der Spiegel precizeaza ca judecatorii constitutionalisti germani au luat deja in dezbatere unele prevederi ale Tratatului de la Lisabona, dar si mecanismele Mecanismului European de Stabilitate si ale pactului fiscal.

Pentru o si mai mare asemanare cu situatia lui Traian Basescu, Angela Merkel a primit un repros deschis din partea judecatorilor Curtii Federale Constitutionale ca “ignora Parlamentul” in deciziile pe care le ia pentru salvarea Euro.

In fine, a treia similitudine se refera si la dezbaterea foarte ampla din societatea germana privind modificarea Constitutiei, tocmai pe fondul disputelor dintre Frau Kanzler si Curtea Federala Constitutionala.

Pregatita prealabil de telefoane si mesaje din partea unor politicieni PPE si PDL, Angela Merkel a reactionat emotional, regasindu-se oarecum pe sine in conflictul pe care Traian Basescu il are la Bucuresti cu Parlamentul, Guvernul si Curtea Constitutionala.

Unii jurnalisti romani si majoritatea politicienilor din PDL se comporta exact ca la inceputul anilor ’90. Mentalitatea de marginasi ai Europei ne-a dominat profund timp de 15 ani pina la intrarea in NATO si s-a prelungit pina la intrarea in UE. Acest tip de comportament in cadrul comunitatii euroatlantice, potrivit carora unii sunt sefi si altii subordonati iese in evidenta ori de cite ori e un conflict politic intern la Bucuresti. “Aoleu, ati vazut, a zis Merkel ca e ingrijorata. A scris unul pe blog in The Economist. Sunt critici in unele ziare germane”.

Daca vorbim despre democratie si statul de drept, vreuna din vocile occidentale a scos un sunet macar cind Curtea Constitutionala a declarat 15 hotarari de guvern ale cabinetului Boc drept neconstitutionale? Dar cind Inalta Curte de Casatie si Justitie, pentru prima oara in istoria sa, a dat un comunicat in care deplingea atacurile de la cel mai inalt nivel asupra sa si instigarea la nerespectarea deciziilor sale definitive si irevocabile? Dar cind in Camera Deputatilor s-au petrecut veritabile atentate la adresa celor mai elementare norme ale dreptului? Sau cind CSAT desemna presa drept vulnerabilitate la adresa securitatii nationale?

Nici unul din liderii politici sau jurnalisti occidentali care azi sunt stimulati sa se ingrijoreze n-au spus atunci nimic. Tacerea lor complice de atunci ma indeamna sa cred ca azi trag semnale de alarma in mod interesat. Politic si financiar.

Merkel Wrestles with Court over Europe’s Future

By Dietmar Hipp and René Pfister

Germany’s Constitutional Court was set up after the war as part of an elaborate system of checks and balances. But recently it has been hampering the Germany government’s efforts to solve the euro crisis, much to the annoyance of some politicians in Berlin. Critics accuse the court of wanting to safeguard its own power.
It isn’t often that German Chancellor Angela Merkel shows her displeasure at something. One of the chancellor’s strengths is that she is able to keep her emotions in check, which explains why her fellow party members were so surprised when the subject of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court was raised in a meeting of the executive committee of her center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) two weeks ago.

The judges had just admonished Merkel for disregarding the rights of the parliament during efforts to rescue the euro. It was already the second ruling in this vein this year. Criticism of Germany’s highest court is generally viewed as inappropriate in political circles, but this time the chancellor had had enough.

How, she asked, could she pursue reasonable policies if she had to reveal her negotiating tactics before every meeting with a European leader? „This takes me to my limit,” Merkel complained, to a murmur of approval from her fellow CDU members. They quickly realized that the chancellor views the judges as unrealistic law professors with no understanding whatsoever of the challenges of everyday politics.

Keeping the Government in Check

Things have never been easy between Berlin and the Karlsruhe-based court. The Federal Constitutional Court was set up in 1951 to ensure that the state’s institutions complied with the constitution of the newly founded Federal Republic of Germany. Since then, government politicians have often viewed the court as a gadfly that can declare laws invalid with the stroke of a pen. A sentence attributed to the late Social Democratic Party politician Herbert Wehner has become legendary: „We won’t allow the assholes in Karlsruhe to destroy our policies.”

It’s in the nature of things that there is occasionally disagreement between the court and the political world. The court’s job is to ensure that the government sticks to the guidelines laid down in the German constitution. Politicians, on the other hand, don’t appreciate it when the court portrays them as underhanded rogues who bend the constitution to conform to their backroom deals. It also doesn’t help matters that the court’s judges generally enjoy a level of popularity that many politicians can only dream of.

Since the eruption of the euro crisis, however, there has been more at stake than the usual vanities. If the court’s landmark ruling on the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty is also taken into account, the judges in their trademark red robes have already crossed Merkel three times in the last few years. The Karlsruhe decisions read like indictments of a chancellor who, in the judges’ opinion, is ignoring the basic rules of democracy with her bailout policies.

Citizens applaud them for their decisions, and it is of course the judges’ job to keep the executive in check when necessary. There are those in Berlin, however, who increasingly suspect that the court is in league with those populists and euroskeptics who are fundamentally opposed to the project of European integration.

Fear of Irrelevance?

German Environment Minister Peter Altmaier, a member of Merkel’s CDU, recently raged against the judges’ criticism of Europe in a meeting of fellow party members. In Altmaier’s view, the judges are motivated by a fear of irrelevance. And it’s true that further steps toward integration typically do lead to a loss of power for the constitutional court, with the European Court of Justice gaining importance as more and more power is transferred to Brussels.

A powerful German institution has already fallen victim to Europe once before. When Germany was still using the deutsche mark, its central bank, the Bundesbank, had the last word on all questions of monetary policy. Since the introduction of the euro, however, the Bundesbank has lost its old luster, shrinking into a sub-organization of the European Central Bank (ECB). The Federal Constitutional Court is apparently determined to avoid a similar fate.

The power struggle is happening at precisely a time when the judges bear an historic responsibility. This time, the issue at stake is not some domestic political question like the national census or the subtleties of electoral law. Instead, the guardians of the constitution have nothing less than the country’s prosperity in their hands.

If they stop the efforts to save the euro, it’s possible that not only could they drag Germany and Europe into a deep recession, but they could also deal a death blow to unity on the continent. For this reason, Merkel’s now-famous remark that „if the euro fails, Europe fails” was also intended as a warning to the Karlsruhe court.

The power struggle is entering a new round this week. On Tuesday, the court will consider requests for a temporary injunction on the permanent euro rescue fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), and the fiscal pact, which is intended to force signatory countries to practice stricter budgetary discipline. Nothing has been decided yet. But just the fact that the judges have set a date for a hearing indicates how seriously they take the arguments of euroskeptics like Peter Gauweiler, a politician with the conservative Christian Social Union (CSU).

%d blogeri au apreciat asta: